Unquiet Desperation
February 09, 2012, 12:42:03 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Shout Box

[History] [Commands]

[January 09, 2012, 09:35:14 PM] Ploe: That I could!

[January 27, 2012, 10:34:49 AM] Raven: I want to say hello and I want to say i was piter pater in the mean time ... god I love to piter pater i miss it so much

[January 27, 2012, 10:35:48 AM] Raven: dont mean to bitter pater?

[January 27, 2012, 10:36:08 AM] Raven: just pitter patter like feats

[January 27, 2012, 10:37:01 AM] Raven: hey pater i have some poems for you to talk shit on

[January 27, 2012, 10:37:12 AM] Raven: be really mean and shit

[January 27, 2012, 10:38:07 AM] Raven: I need pater on my platter

[January 27, 2012, 10:38:16 AM] Raven: a big dose

[January 27, 2012, 10:40:48 AM] Raven: or in brokelyn lingo harry ploter

[January 27, 2012, 10:46:17 AM] Raven: Been reading your new poems pater you on a yeats trip i like it?

[January 30, 2012, 12:49:57 PM] Raven: everyone has a great poem just tell your story in a special way I you will feel you much better

[January 30, 2012, 12:50:51 PM] Raven: these people get so good at writing poems they forget how to tell the story

News: Download the new issue here.
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: New World Order  (Read 7223 times)
Moonchild
Sir Thomas More
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 27


« Reply #25 on: May 30, 2009, 11:24:44 PM »

well for one thing the guy made his point on the first one so why would he have to do it again, Also the 2nd 1 is all about money and how corrupt it is but you go on the website and it says can i have some money for the zeitgeist movement which makes him look stupid and unreliable on his word which weakens to whole point of it its a classic government trick. the rest i think you should find out..
Logged
Ploe
Thomas Paine
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 777


Ferret


WWW
« Reply #26 on: May 31, 2009, 02:55:53 AM »

well for one thing the guy made his point on the first one so why would he have to do it again, Also the 2nd 1 is all about money and how corrupt it is but you go on the website and it says can i have some money for the zeitgeist movement which makes him look stupid and unreliable on his word which weakens to whole point of it its a classic government trick. the rest i think you should find out..

Too right...
Logged

For sale: Baby shoes, never worn.
salvagemydream
Moderator
Sir Isaac Newton
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 66


Robert Fisher


WWW
« Reply #27 on: May 31, 2009, 06:26:24 AM »

well for one thing the guy made his point on the first one so why would he have to do it again, Also the 2nd 1 is all about money and how corrupt it is but you go on the website and it says can i have some money for the zeitgeist movement which makes him look stupid and unreliable on his word which weakens to whole point of it its a classic government trick. the rest i think you should find out..

Nah, I don't buy any of that at all I'm afraid. He had this same discussion with Alex Jones at one point. Peter Joseph stated that he didn't agree with the system at all but would accept the fact that we are currently living in it and funds have to be acquired somehow. The donations to the Zeitgeist movement go to expanding the organisation.

And still you haven't supplied me with any evidence that 2 and 3 were funded/made by the government.

Come people...critical thinking...
Logged

What I'd give to see the universe in it's entirety.
Moonchild
Sir Thomas More
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 27


« Reply #28 on: May 31, 2009, 11:10:43 AM »

this is where the bribed bit comes into it, he probs was bribed to say that remember everything has to be run through the goverment first before its shown, their not gonna let a film like that just to be seen like that without anything to make it weak their whole plan will fall so they must put something in their to throw people off like you right now thats your evidence, just look at it from that perspective and you might get something.
Logged
WA2
Gladiator
Emmeline Pankhurst
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 419


Degenerative Lucidity


« Reply #29 on: May 31, 2009, 11:19:54 AM »

What must be remembered is that they're not trying to fool the average Joe with their plane. They're trying to fool those who might actually be a threat. So what might be logical for a very smart and inquisitive person, may be fooled by their plan, like if they do something obvious to a Joe, seen as a trick by the smarter ones, but could actually be to throw the smarter ones off... the thing now is, is that its a never ending cycle. So what they're plan is becomes un-solvable because it all depends on what they choose.

So...we may never truly know until we actually take 'em down. 50:50 chance to what they actually are and doing. I might be inclined to think that the stuff in the Obama Decpetion video is a ploy to throw us off. But that may be what they WANT me to think. SO then it could be true. But again, that could be what they WANT me to think. You see my point?
Logged

Failed, again.
Moonchild
Sir Thomas More
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 27


« Reply #30 on: May 31, 2009, 12:26:59 PM »

definitely i understand, its hard to know where the line is.
Logged
Ben
Gladiator
Virginia Woolf
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 33



« Reply #31 on: June 02, 2009, 09:43:51 PM »

personally i agree with amer, if the elite are really this powerful they probably create loads of conspiracy theories, or alter ones currently in circulation through information control, to double- or triple- or quadruple bluff the people who pose a threat.
Logged

"I would never belong to a club that would have me as a member"
-Groucho Marx
WA2
Gladiator
Emmeline Pankhurst
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 419


Degenerative Lucidity


« Reply #32 on: June 02, 2009, 09:52:46 PM »

Thats my point. How far does the bluff go? How many levels? WHAT IS THE TRUTH?!?!?
Logged

Failed, again.
Will
Henry David Thoreau
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1281


Everything is Irrelative.


WWW
« Reply #33 on: June 02, 2009, 09:56:15 PM »

Be wise to these matters.  Be agnostic to these matters. 
Logged

I think, therefore I'm lost.
salvagemydream
Moderator
Sir Isaac Newton
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 66


Robert Fisher


WWW
« Reply #34 on: June 05, 2009, 09:53:52 PM »

I think you people are heading deep into madness here. I will believe what I believe because there is something called EVIDENCE! Not some unbacked theory or perspective. Sometimes I think you all want to believe there's more just for your own entertainment.

And even my so called evidence is beginning to be tested at this point in time. Who knows...
Logged

What I'd give to see the universe in it's entirety.
jrkulmer
Gladiator
Ernest Hemingway
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 141


The greatest threat to freedom is free speech.


« Reply #35 on: June 05, 2009, 09:56:02 PM »

Completely unrelated, but salvagemydream, loving the signature, completely agree Smiley
Logged

Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too? - Douglas Adams
WA2
Gladiator
Emmeline Pankhurst
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 419


Degenerative Lucidity


« Reply #36 on: June 07, 2009, 04:37:38 PM »

Sometimes logic is just as good as evidence.
Logged

Failed, again.
jrkulmer
Gladiator
Ernest Hemingway
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 141


The greatest threat to freedom is free speech.


« Reply #37 on: June 07, 2009, 11:16:33 PM »

Our "logic" within our minds tells us that the world is flat. Only with evidence can we convince our intuition that it is wrong. Like evolution, it was dismissed as utter bullshit, then along pops darwin with reams upon reams of evidence, and the world gives into its truth. See what I mean?
Logged

Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too? - Douglas Adams
WA2
Gladiator
Emmeline Pankhurst
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 419


Degenerative Lucidity


« Reply #38 on: June 08, 2009, 06:33:08 PM »

I completely disagree. In fact, I must hasten to retract my statement for fear of jrkulmer getting the wrong end of the stick (again). For you James, I will say that logic works hand in hand with evidence. However, with your example of the world being flat, that is making a logical deduction on what we perceive, whereas it would be more logical to make a decision on what is physically possible.
Logged

Failed, again.
jrkulmer
Gladiator
Ernest Hemingway
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 141


The greatest threat to freedom is free speech.


« Reply #39 on: June 08, 2009, 07:33:02 PM »

aye i agree with you, but sometimes its impossible to percieve the truth without evidence lol. But they DEFINITELY work hand in hand, I submit to that Smiley
Logged

Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too? - Douglas Adams
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!