Today' literary fascism plummeted new depths

[Guest]

[Aristotle Shostakovich]

Today' literary fascism plummeted new depths, i speak of the abomination' that has resulted in the {the bad prose company' pt 1-3} and {escape planet Wakefield} being lumped together, while i can not speak for Mr Nemeth, the bad prose company was writ as one piece, to be split up and fed to U.D over a number of weeks.

imagine may dismay when i look and saw that they'd all been lumped together "all"} i feel that the editor and mediators are over reaching there powers, this is not the first time this has happend, a few weeks ago a poem posted by mesmie was cut up and reposted as snippet of the bigger work' {totally un-exceptable}

what annoys me the most, is the lack of continuity, iv'e posted part 4 {the spunk files} in the poetry section of the carnival' why was this not put in? also i had feedback from will on parts 1 & 2 from Will, but it read like he has giving 2 responses to pt 1, not only does it read wrong, but it stops members commeting on each individual pieces,

it is with regret' that i intend to withdraw all my post, unless it is amended, i apologise to those members that read/enjoy/comment on my work, but, feel that i have no alternative.

nic

[Null]

My bad. I thought I was doing you a favour.

[Aristotle Shostakovich]

yes' i appreciate your intention Null, however, as i stated' it is mandatory that one should tell one of these changes'; to rehitarate in my first post, altering the lay out of the work; alters the syntactic values of the piece as an whole, i can see this working on other level of prose writing I.e {Mr Nemeth' fantical tail} which he was grateful for you posting as one module, however, upon re-reading escaping from planet Wakefield i found that with all th cre-teak-ing at the end, i got lost dissevering what comment matched which part, and yes while i can see the point that putting story prose together may work; i feel with poetry prose there is no feed to each piece, thus rendering the breaking up of the whole, in-valid, hence should be kept apart for members to comment on particular flavours of the pieces in general.

thanks' editor....... for your private e-mail' i will rectify the mel-aly myself; by the removal of said work' and re-posting in the crucible for the earthy bi-valent comments you spake of; and the advice of which you talk .

i apologise for the {I'm taking my ball home}stance, in my first post' and do ecept that this was done in good faith, but when i saw what had happened i was filled with incandescent rage, likening this to commandants in an Juwish death camp: rather then an impartial modal invigilator.

hope i have aired my viewpoint constructively and fully:

thanks for the clear-up;

till soon,

nic
 





 

[simon nemeth]

Just for the record as my name was mentioned here. I DID want all my prose putting into one section and although it annouyed me at first I can see why there is a maximum word count on articles. Thank you Editor for putting them together.

[Editor]

Nic:

No problem, we'd much rather have people that are passionate about their work round here. Might be an idea if next time you messaged us first before thundering from the pulpit, though...

Simon:
Yep, we got it. Glad we could help.

Carpe diem,

Mike,
Editor,
Unquiet Desperation.